Internal Document: How to use ASTM D-2202
1.1 This test method covers a laboratory procedure for the determination of the degree of slump of a sealant when used in a vertical joint in a structure.
1.2 The values stated in either inch-pound or SI (metric) units are to be separately regarded as the standard. Within the text, the inch-pound units are shown in parentheses.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Note: A related ISO standard is ISO 7390. The user should compare to determine how it differs from this test method.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards: C 717 Terminology of Building Seals and Sealants
2.2 ISO Standards: ISO 7390 Building Construction–Sealants–Determination of Resistance to Flow
3.1 Definitions - Refer to Terminology C 717 for definitions of the following terms found in this test method: bead, joint, sealant.
4. Significance and Use
4.1 Excessive sealant slump or sag in a vertical joint may cause improper bead shape or inadequate sealant thickness in the completed joint. Slump measurements, as described in this test method, serve to evaluate only this application characteristic; they do not predict the performance capability of the sealant after installation.
Note: Available at: http://www.frazierinstrument.com/products/fbr/fbr.html/
5.1 Flow Test Jig, constructed in accordance with (SI units) or (inch-pound units).
Note: Most existing flow test jigs have been constructed in inch-pound units.
5.2 Gravity Convection Oven, having a temperature controlled at 50 +/- 2°C (122 +/- 3.6°F).
5.3 Steel Spatula:
5.4 Plastic Scraper, such as an ordinary 114 by 114-mm (4-1 /2 by 4-1 /2 -in.) plastic tile.
6.1 Solvent, such as methyl ethyl ketone.
7.1 Take test specimens from a previously unopened container and mix thoroughly before using, if required for homogeneity.
8.1 Condition both the test jig and the sealant to be tested for at least 5 h at 23 +/- 2°C (73.4 +/- 3.6°F).
9.1 Thoroughly clean the test jig with the solvent; then place it on a level table with the front face upward and the plunger depressed to the limit of its travel.
9.2 Place the mixed, conditioned sealant in the jig cavity. Level the sealant flush with the surface of the block, using one gentle upward stroke of the plastic scraper held at a 45° angle. Avoid forming air pockets in the sealant, especially near the surface of the plunger.
9.3 Carefully clean the area around the cavity with the plastic scraper and a cloth; then place the jig immediately on its end and advance the plunger gently to one half its maximum travel, or 4.75 mm ( 3 /16 in.). This leaves a solid cylinder of caulking or sealant 38.1 mm (1-1 /2 in.) in diameter and 4.75 mm ( 3 /16 in.) thick, ready to flow down the face of the instrument.
9.4 Place the jig immediately in a vertical position on a level shelf in the oven and condition it for 30 min at 50 +/- 2°C (122 +/- 3.6°F), taking care to avoid any movement or vibration of the oven during this period.
9.5 At the conclusion of the 30-min period, take a reading, to the nearest 0.2 mm (0.01 in.) of the maximum point of flow of the compound.
9.6 Clean the jig and recondition it as specified in 8.1.
9.7 Repeat 9.1-9.5 with another specimen of sealant.
10.1 Report the slump readings obtained in each of two tests for each specimen as well as the average value.
11. Precision and Bias
11.1 Precision - The precision statements for this test method were obtained from two separate inter-laboratory tests. In one, five laboratories tested two (2) oil based sealants, each in triplicate. The results are given in Table 1. In the other, four laboratories tested four (4) solvent release sealants, each in duplicate.
11.1.1 Repeatability for Oil-Based Sealants - At 95 % confidence, a variation of as much as 1.07 mm (0.042 in.) can be expected between two test results obtained by the same operator on the same material.
11.1.2 Reproducibility for Oil-Based Sealants—At 95 % confidence, a variation of as much as 1.93 mm (0.076 in.) can be expected between two test results obtained by different operators in different laboratories on the same material.
11.1.3 The data for oil based sealants was generated by testing each sealant in triplicate, whereas the procedure in this test method specifies only duplicate testing. Duplicate testing may yield more variable results than indicated in Table 1.
11.1.4 Repeatability for Solvent-Release Sealants—At 95 % confidence, a variation of as much as 1.35 mm (0.053 in.) can be expected between two test results obtained by the same operator on the same material.
11.1.5 Reproducibility for Solvent Release Sealants—At 95 % confidence, a variation of as much as 1.88 mm (0.074 in.) can be expected between two test results obtained by different operators in different laboratories on the same material.
11.2 Bias—Since there is no accepted reference material suitable for determining the bias for this test method, bias has not been determined.
Table 1 - Precision and Bias Data
Estimated Standard Deviation (Within Laboratory)
Estimated Standard Deviation (Between Laboratory)
12.1 sag; sealant; slump; flow; rheology; d2202; ISO 7390